Thank you for your Jack Skellington I just backed you some shut the fucupcakes shirt. Each insurer has different underwriting guides and re-insurers. This means that every single insurer will evaluate risk differently. For example one insurer that does not like risk on their books will decline cover altogether where as another may be completely fine. The medical tests and results you have mentioned are fine with a quite a few U.K. insurers that I know of. It is worth approaching a broker that does not charge a fee to conduct all research for you and find the policy that best suits you and your circumstances. I would certainly support your doctors view that the condition mentioned is not of any immediate concern. I imagine that people who take the set of positions outlined in the original question (it is good to let people struggle for livelihood; it is bad to let them die) would argue that in the former case they are learning self-sufficiency, while in the latter case any lessons they might have learned are a moot point if they are not alive enough to put them into practice.
Obviously, not everybody subscribes to this way of Jack Skellington I just backed you some shut the fucupcakes shirt. At one extreme, you have people who would not help others under any circumstances, even if it meant those others would die; at the other extreme, you have people who would say perfect equality of outcome is desirable. A sampling distribution is constructed from the theoretical collection of many samples’ means. It’s commonplace to take one large sample but then to calculate the moments of a theoretical aggregation of many samples.